4.7 Article

Imaging evolution of acute lacunar infarction Leukoariosis or lacune?

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 11, Pages 1091-1095

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822e1470

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In acute lacunar infarction, MRI may overestimate eventual infarct size and the imaging evolution of acute lesions is not fully understood. Our objective was to examine eventual infarct size, the incidence of cavity formation, and factors associated with cavitation in patients presenting with acute lacunar infarction. Methods: Patients with acute diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) infarcts <= 25 mm in diameter, in the distribution of a penetrating artery, who had a follow-up MRI or CT at least 1 month or longer from stroke onset were retrospectively included. We measured baseline lesion size on DWI and T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and follow-up lesion size on T2/FLAIR and CT. Follow-up MRI and CT images were assessed for cavity formation. Predictors for cavitation were assessed in a multivariate model. Results: We identified 75 patients with lacunar infarction and follow-up CT or MRI, done 20.2 +/- 16.6 and 21.2 +/- 17.4 months after stroke, respectively. Mean baseline DWI size was 13.5 +/- 5.7 and T2/FLAIR size was 13.1 +/- 5.3 mm. Follow-up T2/FLAIR lesion size was 8.2 +/- 3.4 mm and smaller than baseline DWI and T2/FLAIR (p = <0.001). Follow-up whole lesion size on CT scan was 7.1 +/- 4.1 and smaller than baseline DWI and T2/FLAIR (p = 0.001). Cavitation occurred in 23/38 (61%) MRI and 50/70 (70%) CT scans. We identified periventricular white matter lesions as a predictor of cavity formation by MRI and CT. Conclusion: Acute DWI significantly overestimates final infarct size. A third of lacunar infarcts do not develop a cavity. Neurology (R) 2011;77:1091-1095

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available