4.7 Article

Etiologic investigation of ischemic stroke in young adults

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 23, Pages 1983-1988

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821e5517

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim
  2. sanofi-aventis
  3. GlaxoSmithKline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: We attempted to classify causes of ischemic stroke in young adults using a progressive diagnostic algorithm and the ASCO (atherosclerosis, small-vessel disease, cardiac source, other cause) classification system. Methods: Patients aged 16-54 years consecutively treated for acute ischemic stroke in a tertiary stroke unit were included in this retrospective analysis. Causes of stroke were classified using the ASCO system, which assigns a graded level of likelihood to each potential cause in individual patients. The initial etiologic workup included brain imaging, magnetic resonance or CT angiography of cerebral and cervical vessels, EKG, and routine blood studies. Patients without a definite cause of ischemic stroke after initial evaluation underwent transesophageal echocardiography. Results: We included 318 patients (195 men and 123 women); 131 patients were aged 16-44 years, and 187 were aged 45-54 years. A definite cause of stroke (ASCO grade 1) could be identified in 145 patients (45.5%). An uncertain cause of stroke (ASCO grade 2) was found in 59 (18.5%) further patients. Most (130 of 145) definite causes were identified by initial evaluation. The 2 major definite or uncertain causes of stroke were patent foramen ovale associated with atrial septal aneurysm (PFO-ASA) (20 of 131 [15.3%]) and dissection of the cervical or cerebral artery (19 of 131 [14.5%]) in patients aged 16-44 years and large-vessel atherosclerosis (37 of 187 [19.8%]) and PFO-ASA (23 of 187 [12.3%]) in patients aged 45-54 years. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that PFO-ASA may be a major cause of ischemic stroke in young adults. Neurology (R) 2011;76:1983-1988

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available