4.7 Article

All the 1p19q codeleted gliomas are mutated on IDH1 or IDH2

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 23, Pages 1886-1890

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e1cf3a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer
  2. Institut National du Cancer (INCA) [PL 046]
  3. Association pour la Recherche sur les Tumeurs Cerebrales (ARTC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recently, the gene encoding the human cytosolic NADPH-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1) was reported frequently mutated in gliomas. Rare mutations were also found in the sequence of the mitochondrial isoform IDH2. Methods: In a series of 764 gliomas genome-wide characterized, we determined the presence of mutations in the sequences of both IDH1 and IDH2 genes by direct sequencing. Results: We found that all tumors with complete 1p19q codeletion (n = 128) were mutated in the IDH1 (118) or IDH2 (10) gene. This 100% mutation rate contrasted strikingly with other gliomas exhibiting either variable 1p and 19q alterations (n = 159, IDH1/IDH2 mutation rate of 33%) or no 1p19q alteration (n = 477, IDH1/IDH2 mutation rate 32%). Our data also confirm the prognostic impact of IDH1/IDH2 mutation in gliomas whatever grade considered: patients harboring mutations of IDH1/IDH2 have an improved median overall survival. Moreover, in WHO grade II and III gliomas, 3 groups with significantly different outcomes were identified according to their 1p19q and IDH1/IDH2 statuses. Tumors carrying both alterations had longer overall survival than their nonmutated counterpart. Conclusions: This exclusive association suggests a new mechanism of tumorigenesis. Perhaps the IDH1/IDH2 mutation is a prerequisite for the occurrence of the t(1;19) translocation, or it is required for the 1p19q codeleted cells to acquire a tumor phenotype. Neurology (R) 2010;74:1886-1890

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available