4.7 Article

11C-PIB binding is increased in patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related hemorrhage

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages 487-493

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181cef7e3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Pfizer Cardio Vascular Lipid (CVL)
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The in vivo diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is inferred from clinical and structural imaging features. C-11-Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) is a PET ligand that binds to beta-amyloid in extracellular plaques and vessel walls. We hypothesized that patients with a clinical diagnosis of CAA-related hemorrhage (CAAH) have increased C-11-PIB uptake and that the pattern differs from Alzheimer disease (AD). Methodology: Patients with CAAH based on established clinical criteria were studied using C-11-PIB PET and were compared with age-matched controls and patients with AD. Distribution volume ratio (DVR) parametric maps were created using the cerebellar cortex as a reference region. Results: Twelve patients with CAAH of mean age 73.9 (range 58-93) years were compared with 22 normal controls and 13 patients with AD of mean age 71.8 (59-83) and 73.8 (56-90) years, respectively. CAAH PIB median DVR binding was higher in cortical regions (1.69, interquartile range 1.44-1.97) compared with controls (1.32, 1.21-1.44, p = 0.002) but lower than AD (2.04, 1.93-2.26, p = 0.004). The occipital-global uptake ratio was lower among patients with AD than among patients with CAAH (p = 0.008), and the frontal-global uptake ratio was higher (p = 0.012). Conclusion: C-11-Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) binding is moderately increased in most patients with probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA)-related intracerebral hemorrhage. The distribution may differ from that seen in Alzheimer disease. C-11-PIB PET may assist in the in vivo diagnosis of CAA and serve as a surrogate marker for future therapeutic studies. Neurology (R) 2010; 74: 487-493

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available