4.4 Article

Density and Viscosity of Athabasca Bitumen Samples at Temperatures Up to 200°C and Pressures Up to 10 MPa

Journal

SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 375-386

Publisher

SOC PETROLEUM ENG
DOI: 10.2118/176026-PA

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BP Canada Energy Group ULC
  2. Brion Energy
  3. Cenovus Energy
  4. Chevron Energy Technology Company
  5. Computer Modelling Group Limited
  6. ConocoPhillips Canada
  7. Devon Canada Company
  8. Foundation CMG
  9. Husky Energy
  10. Imperial Oil Limited
  11. Japan Canada Oil Sands Limited
  12. Larcina Energy Limited
  13. Nexen Energy ULC
  14. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  15. N-Solv Company
  16. Osum Oil Sands Company
  17. PennWest Energy
  18. Statoil Canada Limited
  19. Suncor Energy
  20. Total EP Canada
  21. Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering
  22. Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the measurements of bitumen thermophysical properties (density and viscosity) over a wide range of temperatures (ambient to 200 degrees C) and pressures (atmospheric to 14 MPa). The measurements have been conducted on three Athabasca bitumen samples taken from different locations. A new method was proposed to correlate the density data as a function of temperature and pressure, with a maximum absolute deviation of 1.7 kg/m(3). The viscosity data were also correlated with two correlations available in literature considering the effect of pressure and temperature on viscosity of bitumen, with an average absolute relative deviation of 9.2%. The measured data and correlations are applicable for the prediction and optimization of oil recovery in the solvent-and thermal-based bitumen-recovery processes such as expanding-solvent steam assisted gravity drainage (ES-SAGD) and heated vapor extraction (VAPEX).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available