4.7 Article

Relationships between biomarkers in aging and dementia

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 73, Issue 15, Pages 1193-1199

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bc010c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [AG024904, AG027859]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: PET imaging using [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and [C-11]Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) have been proposed as biomarkers of Alzheimer disease (AD), as have CSF measures of the 42 amino acid beta-amyloid protein (A beta(1-42)) and total and phosphorylated tau (t-tau and p-tau). Relationships between biomarkers and with disease severity are incompletely understood. Methods: Ten subjects with AD, 11 control subjects, and 34 subjects with mild cognitive impairment from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative underwent clinical evaluation; CSF measurement of A beta(1-42), t-tau, and p-tau; and PIB-PET and FDG-PET scanning. Data were analyzed using continuous regression and dichotomous outcomes with subjects classified as positive or negative for AD based on cutoffs established in patients with AD and controls from other cohorts. Results: Dichotomous categorization showed substantial agreement between PIB-PET and CSF A beta(1-42) measures (91% agreement, kappa = 0.74), modest agreement between PIB-PET and p-tau (76% agreement, kappa = 0.50), and minimal agreement for other comparisons (kappa < 0.3). Mini-Mental State Examination score was significantly correlated with FDG-PET but not with PIB-PET or CSF A beta(1-42). Regression models adjusted for diagnosis showed that PIB-PET was significantly correlated with A beta(1-42), t-tau, and p-tau(181p), whereas FDG-PET was correlated only with A beta(1-42). Conclusions: PET and CSF biomarkers of A beta agree with one another but are not related to cognitive impairment. [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET is modestly related to other biomarkers but is better related to cognition. Different biomarkers for Alzheimer disease provide different information from one another that is likely to be complementary. Neurology (R) 2009; 73: 1193-1199

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available