4.7 Article

Novel mutations in Myoclonin1/EFHC1 in sporadic and familial juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 70, Issue 22, Pages 2137-2144

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000313149.73035.99

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01-NS42376, R01 NS055057] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) accounts for 3 to 12% of all epilepsies. In 2004, the GENESS Consortium demonstrated four missense mutations in Myoclonin1/EFHC1 of chromosome 6p12.1 segregating in 20% of Hispanic families with JME. Objective: To examine what percentage of consecutive JME clinic cases have mutations in Myoclonin1/EFHC1. Methods: We screened 44 consecutive patients from Mexico and Honduras and 67 patients from Japan using heteroduplex analysis and direct sequencing. Results: We found five novel mutations in transcripts A and B of Myoclonin1/EFHC1. Two novel heterozygous missense mutations (c. 755C > A and c. 1523C > G) in transcript A occurred in both a singleton from Mexico and another singleton from Japan. A deletion/frameshift (C. 789del. AV264fsx280) in transcript B was present in a mother and daughter from Mexico. A nonsense mutation (c. 829C > T) in transcript B segregated in four clinically and seven epileptiform-EEG affected members of a large Honduran family. The same nonsense mutation (c. 829C > T) occurred as a de novo mutation in a sporadic case. Finally, we found a three-base deletion (-364(boolean AND)- 362del. GAT) in the promoter region in a family from Japan. Conclusion: Nine percent of consecutive juvenile myoclonic epilepsy cases from Mexico and Honduras clinics and 3% of clinic patients from Japan carry mutations in Myoclonin1/EFCH1. These results represent the highest number and percentage of mutations found for a juvenile myoclonic epilepsy causing gene of any population group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available