4.5 Article

Microbleeds on susceptibility-weighted MRI in depressive and non-depressive patients after mild traumatic brain injury

Journal

NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 35, Issue 10, Pages 1533-1539

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-014-1788-3

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury; Depression; Magnetic resonance imaging; Susceptibility-weighted imaging; Microbleeds

Funding

  1. National Natural Scientific Fund of China [81000609, 81271540, 81301213]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between abnormality on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and newly-developed depression after mild traumatic brain injury. The study registered 200 patients with closed TBI and normal finding at CT and conventional MRI. All patients underwent MRI including conventional MR sequences and SWI. The number and volume of microbleed lesions were semi-automatically outlined and manually counted. All patients were followed up with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-IV) within 1 year after TBI. The difference in microbleed lesions on SWI was compared between the depressive and non-depressive groups. The depressive group had a higher rate of abnormality on SWI than did the non-depressive group (p < 0.001). Among patients that had exhibited microbleed lesions, the number and volume of lesions were greater in the depressive group than the non-depressive group (both p < 0.001). These differences in numbers and volume of lesions were found only at the frontal, parietal and temporal lobes (all p < 0.001). Among patients that had exhibited microbleed lesions, the number and volume of lesions in other areas were not significantly different between the depressive and non-depressive groups (all p > 0.05). In conclusion, SWI was useful to identify the microbleed lesions after mild TBI. The distribution range and location of microbleed lesions were correlated with depression after TBI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available