4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Embryonic neurons transplanted into the tibial nerve reinnervate muscle and reduce atrophy but NCAM expression persists

Journal

NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 183-189

Publisher

MANEY PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1179/174313208X281073

Keywords

denervated muscle; functional reinnervation; motoneuron transplantation; neural cell adhesion molecule

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-39098] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of this study was to use the glycogen depletion technique to determine whether reinnervated muscle fibers could be distinguished from denervated muscle fibers by their size or by neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) expression. Methods: Medial gastrocnemius muscles of five adult Fischer rats were reinnervated from embryonic neurons transplanted into the distal stump of the tibial nerve. Ten weeks later, the transplants were stimulated repeatedly to deplete reinnervated muscle fibers of glyco en. Areas of reinnervated (glycogen-depleted) muscle fibers were measured and assessed for NCAM expression. The areas of muscle fibers from reinnervated, denervated (n=5) and unoperated control muscles (n=5) were compared. Results: Mean reinnervated muscle fiber area was significantly larger than the mean for denervated fibers (mean +/- SE. 40 +/- 6 and 10 +/- 1 % of unoperated control fibers, respectively). NCAM was expressed in 55 +/- 7% of reinnervated fibers (mean +/- SE; range: 42-77%). The mean areas of reinnervated fibers that did or did not express NCAM were similar. NCAM was only expressed in some fibers in completely denervated muscles. Discussion: Our data show that NCAM expression does not differentiate muscle denervation or reinnervation. Quantifying the area of large fibers did distineuish reinnervated muscle fibers from denervated fibers and showed that reinnervation of muscle from neurons placed in peripheral nerve is a strategy to rescue muscle from atrophy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available