4.3 Article

Obscuring Surface Anatomy in Volumetric Imaging Data

Journal

NEUROINFORMATICS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 65-75

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12021-012-9160-3

Keywords

Biomedical imaging; Facial recognition; MR imaging; CT imaging; Privacy; 3D

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB009352] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [P30 NS048056] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The identifying or sensitive anatomical features in MR and CT images used in research raise patient privacy concerns when such data are shared. In order to protect human subject privacy, we developed a method of anatomical surface modification and investigated the effects of such modification on image statistics and common neuroimaging processing tools. Common approaches to obscuring facial features typically remove large portions of the voxels. The approach described here focuses on blurring the anatomical surface instead, to avoid impinging on areas of interest and hard edges that can confuse processing tools. The algorithm proceeds by extracting a thin boundary layer containing surface anatomy from a region of interest. This layer is then stretched and flattened to fit into a thin box volume. After smoothing along a plane roughly parallel to anatomy surface, this volume is transformed back onto the boundary layer of the original data. The above method, named normalized anterior filtering, was coded in MATLAB and applied on a number of high resolution MR and CT scans. To test its effect on automated tools, we compared the output of selected common skull stripping and MR gain field correction methods used on unmodified and obscured data. With this paper, we hope to improve the understanding of the effect of surface deformation approaches on the quality of de-identified data and to provide a useful de-identification tool for MR and CT acquisitions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available