4.7 Article

Spurious group differences due to head motion in a diffusion MRI study

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 79-90

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.027

Keywords

Diffusion MRI; Tractography; Motion; Autism

Funding

  1. Autism & Dyslexia Project
  2. Ellison Medical Foundation
  3. National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [K99/R00-EB008129, R01-EB006758]
  4. National Center for Research Resources [P41-RR14, Q75, U24-RR021382]
  5. National Institute on Aging [AG022381, 5R01-AG008122-22]
  6. National Center for Alternative Medicine [RC1-AT005728-01]
  7. National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01NS052585-01, 1R21-NS072652-01, 1R01-NS070963]
  8. Shared Instrumentation Grants [1S10RR023401, 1S10RR019307, 1S10RR023043]
  9. National Institutes of Health Blueprint for Neuroscience Research [5U01-MH093765]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) has become a popular imaging modality for probing the microstructural properties of white matter and comparing them between populations in vivo. However, the contrast in DW-MRI arises from the microscopic random motion of water molecules in brain tissues, which malces it particularly sensitive to macroscopic head motion. Although this has been known since the introduction of DW-MRI, most studies that use this modality for group comparisons do not report measures of head motion for each group and rely on registration-based correction methods that cannot eliminate the full effects of head motion on the DW-MR! contrast. In this work we use data from children with autism and typically developing children to investigate the effects of head motion on differences in anisotropy and diffusivity measures between groups. We show that group differences in head motion can induce group differences in DW-MRI measures, and that this is the case even when comparing groups that include control subjects only, where no anisotropy or diffusivity differences are expected. We also show that such effects can be more prominent in some white-matter pathways than others, and that they can be ameliorated by including motion as a nuisance regressor in the analyses. Our results demonstrate the importance of taking head motion into account in any population study where one group might exhibit more head motion than the other. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available