4.7 Review

Joint decorrelation, a versatile tool for multichannel data analysis

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 98, Issue -, Pages 487-505

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.068

Keywords

Electroencephalography (EEG); Magnetoencephalography (MEG); Local field potential (LFP); Electrocorticography (ECoG); Optical imaging; Multielectrode array; Denoising; Noise reduction; Artifact rejection; Blind source separation (BSS); Independent Component Analysis (ICA); Denoising Source Separation (DSS); Common Spatial Pattern (CSP); Time Domain source separation (TDSEP); Simultaneous diagonalization; Joint diagonalization; Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

Funding

  1. BBSRC [H006958/1]
  2. ANR [ANR-10-LABX-0087 IEC, ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL*]
  3. PSL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We review a simple yet versatile approach for the analysis of multichannel data, focusing in particular on brain signals measured with EEG, MEG, ECoG, LFP or optical imaging. Sensors are combined linearly with weights that are chosen to provide optimal signal-to-noise ratio. Signal and noise can be variably defined to match the specific need, e.g. reproducibility over trials, frequency content, or differences between stimulus conditions. We demonstrate how the method can be used to remove power line or cardiac interference, enhance stimulus-evoked or stimulus-induced activity, isolate narrow-band cortical activity, and so on. The approach involves decorrelating both the original and filtered data by joint diagonalization of their covariance matrices. We trace its origins; offer an easy-to-understand explanation; review a range of applications; and chart failure scenarios that might lead to misleading results, in particular due to overfitting. In addition to its flexibility and effectiveness, a major appeal of the method is that it is easy to understand. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available