4.7 Article

Shrinkage prediction of seed-voxel brain connectivity using resting state fMRI

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 938-944

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.043

Keywords

Resting-state fMRI; Measurement error correction; Connectivity analysis; Shrinkage estimator; Empirical Bayes

Funding

  1. NIH from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [RO1 NS060910, RO1 NS085211, RO1 NS048527]
  2. NIH from the National Institute of Mental Health [RO1 MH095836, RO1 MH085328, RO1 MH078160]
  3. NIH from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [RO1 EB016061, P41 EB015909]
  4. Johns Hopkins-National Institutes of Mental Health joint training program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) is used to investigate synchronous activations in spatially distinct regions of the brain, which are thought to reflect functional systems supporting cognitive processes. Analyses are often performed using seed-based correlation analysis, allowing researchers to explore functional connectivity between data in a seed region and the rest of the brain. Using scan-rescan rs-fMRI data, we investigate how well the subject-specific seed-based correlation map from the second replication of the study can be predicted using data from the first replication. We show that one can dramatically improve prediction of subject-specific connectivity by borrowing strength from the group correlation map computed using all other subjects in the study. Even more surprisingly, we found that the group correlation map provided a better prediction of a subject's connectivity than the individual's own data. While further discussion and experimentation are required to understand how this can be used in practice, results indicate that shrinkage-based methods that borrow strength from the population mean should play a role in rs-fMRI data analysis. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available