4.7 Article

Atlas-based head modeling and spatial normalization for high-density diffuse optical tomography: In vivo validation against fMRI

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 85, Issue -, Pages 117-126

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.069

Keywords

Diffuse optical tomography; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Brain mapping; Anatomical atlas; Non-linear registration; Spatial normalization; Group analysis

Funding

  1. NIH [R01-EB009233]
  2. Fulbright Science and Technology Ph.D. Award
  3. Autism Speaks Postdoctoral Translational Research Fellowship [7962]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diffuse optical imaging (DOI) is increasingly becoming a valuable neuroimaging tool when fMRI is precluded. Recent developments in high-density diffuse optical tomography (HD-DOT) overcome previous limitations of sparse DOI systems, providing improved image quality and brain specificity. These improvements in instrumentation prompt the need for advancements in both i) realistic forward light modeling for accurate HD-DOT image reconstruction, and ii) spatial normalization for voxel-wise comparisons across subjects. Individualized forward light models derived from subject-specific anatomical images provide the optimal inverse solutions, but such modeling may not be feasible in all situations. In the absence of subject-specific anatomical images, atlas-based head models registered to the subject's head using cranial fiducials provide an alternative solution. In addition, a standard atlas is attractive because it defines a common coordinate space in which to compare results across subjects. The question therefore arises as to whether atlas-based forward light modeling ensures adequate HD-DOT image quality at the individual and group level. Herein, we demonstrate the feasibility of using atlas-based forward light modeling and spatial normalization methods. Both techniques are validated using subject-matched HD-DOT and fMRI data sets for visual evoked responses measured in five healthy adult subjects. HD-DOT reconstructions obtained with the registered atlas anatomy (i.e. atlas DOT) had an average localization error of 2.7 mm relative to reconstructions obtained with the subject-specific anatomical images (Le. subject-MRI DOT), and 6.6 mm relative to fMRI data. At the group level, the localization error of atlas DOT reconstruction was 4.2 mm relative to subject-MRI DOT reconstruction, and 6.1 mm relative to fMRI. These results show that atlas-based image reconstruction provides a viable approach to individual head modeling for HD-DOT when anatomical imaging is not available. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available