4.7 Article

Comparing connectomes across subjects and populations at different scales

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages 416-425

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.084

Keywords

Brain connectivity; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Diffusion imaging; Multiple testing; Multiple comparisons; Bonferroni; Family-wise error rate (FWER); False discovery rate FDR; Graph theory

Funding

  1. FNS [200020_14467, 320030_130090]
  2. Leenaards Foundation
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [320030_130090] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brain connectivity can be represented by a network that enables the comparison of the different patterns of structural and functional connectivity among individuals. In the literature, two levels of statistical analysis have been considered in comparing brain connectivity across groups and subjects: 1) the global comparison where a single measure that summarizes the information of each brain is used in a statistical test; 2) the local analysis where a single test is performed either for each node/connection which implies a multiplicity correction, or for each group of nodes/connections where each subset is summarized by one single test in order to reduce the number of tests to avoid a penalizing multiplicity correction. We comment on the different levels of analysis and present some methods that have been proposed at each scale. We highlight as well the possible factors that could influence the statistical results and the questions that have to be addressed in such an analysis. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available