4.7 Review

Neuroimaging in aphasia treatment research: Quantifying brain lesions after stroke

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 73, Issue -, Pages 208-214

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.044

Keywords

Structural anatomy; Language recovery; Stroke; Aphasia; Brain lesions

Funding

  1. School of Communication
  2. Northwestern University
  3. UK Medical Research Council [G0701888]
  4. Australian Research Council [DP0880556]
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council
  6. National Institutes of Health, Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders [R01DCOI948-17, R01DC007213, R01DC05375]
  7. MRC [G0701888] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [G0701888] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Australian Research Council [DP0880556] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New structural and functional neuroimaging methods continue to rapidly develop, offering promising tools for cognitive neuroscientists. In the last 20 years, advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques have provided invaluable insights into how language is represented and processed in the brain and how it can be disrupted by damage to, or dysfunction of, various parts of the brain. Current functional MRI (fMRI) approaches have also allowed researchers to purposefully investigate how individuals recover language after stroke. This paper presents recommendations for quantification of brain lesions derived from discussions among international researchers at the Neuroimaging in Aphasia Treatment Research Workshop held at Northwestern University (Evanston, Illinois, USA). Methods for detailing and characterizing the brain damage that can influence results of fMRI studies in chronic aphasic stroke patients are discussed. Moreover, we aimed to provide the reader with a set of general practical guidelines and references to facilitate choosing adequate structural imaging strategies that facilitate fMRI studies in aphasia treatment research. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available