4.7 Article

MIRIAD-Public release of a multiple time point Alzheimer's MR imaging dataset

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages 33-36

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.044

Keywords

Alzheimer's; MRI; Longitudinal; Imaging; Database

Funding

  1. UK Alzheimer's Society
  2. GlaxoSmithKline
  3. Medical Research Council
  4. EPSRC [EP/H046410/1]
  5. Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre (CBRC) Strategic Investment Award [168]
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/J014257/1]
  7. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Unit in Dementia based at University College London Hospitals (UCLH), University College London (UCL)
  8. Wellcome Trust [091593/Z/10/Z]
  9. EPSRC [EP/H046410/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. MRC [MR/J014257/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Alzheimer's Society [166] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H046410/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Medical Research Council [MR/J014257/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Minimal Interval Resonance Imaging in Alzheimer's Disease (MIRIAD) dataset is a series of longitudinal volumetric T1 MRI scans of 46 mild-moderate Alzheimer's subjects and 23 controls. It consists of 708 scans conducted by the same radiographer with the same scanner and sequences at intervals of 2, 6, 14, 26, 38 and 52 weeks, 18 and 24 months from baseline, with accompanying information on gender, age and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Details of the cohort and imaging results have been described in peer-reviewed publications, and the data are here made publicly available as a common resource for researchers to develop, validate and compare techniques, particularly for measurement of longitudinal volume change in serially acquired MR. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available