4.7 Article

Neuropsychiatric deep brain stimulation for translational neuroimaging

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages 30-41

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.065

Keywords

Deep brain stimulation; Functional neuroimaging; Gilles de la Tourette syndrome; Positron emission tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Obsessive-compulsive disorder; Treatment-resistant depression

Funding

  1. Austrian National Bank [OeNB 13219]
  2. Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, (NARSAD), USA
  3. Medical University, Austria
  4. University of Vienna, Austria [FA103FC001]
  5. Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research [FAS: 2011-0627]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

From a neuroimaging point of view, deep brain stimulation (DBS) in psychiatric disorders represents a unique source of information to probe results gained in functional, structural and molecular neuroimaging studies in vivo. However, the implementation has, up to now, been restricted by the heterogeneity of the data reported in DBS studies. The aim of the present study was therefore to provide a comprehensive and standardized database of currently used DBS targets in selected psychiatric disorders (obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), treatment-resistant depression (TRD), Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS)) to enable topological comparisons between neuroimaging results and stimulation areas. A systematic literature research was performed and all peer-reviewed publications until the year 2012 were included. Literature research yielded a total of 84 peer-reviewed studies including about 296 psychiatric patients. The individual stimulation data of 37 of these studies meeting the inclusion criteria which included a total of 202 patients (63 OCD, 89 TRD, 50 GTS) was translated into MNI stereotactic space with respect to AC origin in order to identify key targets. The created database can be used to compare DBS target areas in MNI stereotactic coordinates with: 1) activation patterns in functional brain imaging (fMRI, phfMRI, PET, MET, EEG); 2) brain connectivity data (e.g., MR-based DTI/tractography, functional and effective connectivity); 3) quantitative molecular distribution data (e.g., neuroreceptor PET, post-mortem neuroreceptor mapping); 4) structural data (e.g., VBM for neuroplastic changes). Vice versa, the structural, functional and molecular data may provide a rationale to define new DBS targets and adjust/fine-tune currently used targets in DBS based on this overview in stereotactic coordinates. Furthermore, the availability of DBS data in stereotactic space may facilitate the investigation and interpretation of treatment effects and side effect of DBS by comparing these to neuroimaging results. The present study thus improves comparability between functional, structural and molecular data in standard stereotactic space gained in neuroimaging studies with surgical targets for DBS, which is among other possible implications of crucial importance for the definition of new targets for effective DBS. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available