4.7 Article

The primary somatosensory cortex largely contributes to the early part of the cortical response elicited by nociceptive stimuli

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages 1571-1581

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.069

Keywords

Laser-evoked potentials (LEPs); Nociception; Postcentral gyrus; Primary somatosensory cortex; Source analysis

Funding

  1. British Academy
  2. BBSRC
  3. British Council
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G01177X/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/G01177X/2] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on the cortical sources of nociceptive laser-evoked brain potentials (LEPs) began almost two decades ago (Tarkka and Treede, 1993). Whereas there is a large consensus on the sources of the late part of the LEP waveform (N2 and P2 waves), the relative contribution of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) to the early part of the LEP waveform (N1 wave) is still debated. To address this issue we recorded LEPs elicited by the stimulation of four limbs in a large population (n = 35). Early LEP generators were estimated both at single-subject and group level, using three different approaches: distributed source analysis, dipolar source modeling, and probabilistic independent component analysis (ICA). We show that the scalp distribution of the earliest LEP response to hand stimulation was maximal over the central-parietal electrodes contralateral to the stimulated side, while that of the earliest LEP response to foot stimulation was maximal over the central-parietal midline electrodes. Crucially, all three approaches indicated hand and foot Si areas as generators of the earliest LEP response. Altogether, these findings indicate that the earliest part of the scalp response elicited by a selective nociceptive stimulus is largely explained by activity in the contralateral Si, with negligible contribution from the secondary somatosensory cortex (S). (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available