4.7 Article

Task by stimulus interactions in brain responses during Chinese character processing

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 979-990

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.036

Keywords

Reading; fMRI; Task effects; Testing for interactions in BOLD data

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning [CNKOPZD1005]
  2. NIH [R21-DC0008969, R01-HD067364]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. NSF of China [30870758]
  5. NSF of Beijing [7092051]
  6. Ministry of Education [10YJCZH194]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the visual word recognition literature, it is well understood that various stimulus effects interact with behavioral task. For example, effects of word frequency are exaggerated and effects of spelling-to-sound regularity are reduced in the lexical decision task, relative to reading aloud. Neuroimaging studies of reading often examine effects of task and stimulus properties on brain activity independently, but potential interactions between task demands and stimulus effects have not been extensively explored. To address this issue, we conducted lexical decision and symbol detection tasks using stimuli that varied parametrically in their word-likeness, and tested for task by stimulus class interactions. Interactions were found throughout the reading system, such that stimulus selectivity was observed during the lexical decision task, but not during the symbol detection task. Further, the pattern of stimulus selectivity was directly related to task difficulty, so that the strongest brain activity was observed to the most word-like stimuli that required no responses, whereas brain activity to words, which elicit rapid and accurate yes responses were relatively weak. This is in line with models that argue for task-dependent specialization of brain regions, and contrasts with the notion of task-independent stimulus selectivity in the reading system. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available