4.7 Article

The time course of activity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex during top-down attentional control

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 1292-1302

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.061

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [P50 MH079485, R01 MH61358, T32 MH19554]
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse [R21 DA14111]
  3. University of Illinois Beckman Institute, Department of Psychology, and Intercampus Research Initiative in Biotechnology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A network of brain regions has been implicated in top-down attentional control, including left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). The present experiment evaluated predictions of the cascade-of-control model (Banich, 2009), which predicts that during attentionally-demanding tasks, LDLPFC imposes a top-down attentional set which precedes late-stage selection performed by dACC. Furthermore, the cascade-of-control model argues that dACC must increase its activity to compensate when top-down control by LDLPFC is Poor. The present study tested these hypotheses using fMRI and dense-array ERP data collected from the same 80 participants in separate sessions. fMRI results guided ERP source modeling to characterize the time Course of activity in LDLPFC and dACC. As predicted, dACC activity subsequent to LDLPFC activity distinguished Congruent and incongruent conditions on the Stroop task. Furthermore, when LDLPFC activity was low, the level of dACC activity was related to performance outcome. These results demonstrate that dACC responds to attentional demand in a flexible manner that is dependent on the level of LDLPFC activity earlier in a trial. Overall, results were consistent with the temporal course of regional brain function proposed by the cascade-of-control model. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available