4.7 Article

Quantitation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in healthy human brain using positron emission tomography and an inverse agonist radioligand

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 362-370

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.059

Keywords

Positron emission tomography; Brain imaging; Neuroimaging

Funding

  1. Eli Lilly [Z01-MH-002852-04, Z01-MH-002793-04]
  2. NIMH [Z01-MH-002852-04, Z01-MH-002793-04]
  3. Academy of Finland
  4. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  5. Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies
  6. Finnish Medical Foundation
  7. Instrumentarium Foundation
  8. Jalmari and Rauha Ahokas Foundation
  9. Paulo Foundation
  10. Research Foundation of Orion Corporation
  11. Yrj Jahnsson Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

[C-11]MePPEP is a high affinity, CB1 receptor-selective, inverse agonist that has been studied in rodents and monkeys. We examined the ability of [C-11]MePPEP to quantify CB1 receptors in human brain as distribution volume calculated with the gold standard method of compartmental modeling and compared results with the simple measure of brain uptake. A total of 17 healthy subjects participated in 26 positron emission tomography (PET) scans, with 8 having two PET scans to assess retest variability. After injection of [C-11]MePPEP, brain uptake of radioactivity was high (e.g., 3.6 SUV in putamen at similar to 60 min) and washed out very slowly. A two-tissue compartment model yielded values of distribution volume (which is proportional to receptor density) that were both well identified (SE 5%) and stable between 60 and 210 min. The simple measure of brain uptake (average concentration of radioactivity between 40 and 80 min) had good retest variability (similar to 8%) and moderate intersubject variability (16%, coefficient of variation). In contrast, distribution volume had two-fold greater retest variability (similar to 15%) and, thus, less precision. In addition, distribution volume had three-fold greater intersubject variability (similar to 52%). The decreased precision of distribution volume compared to brain uptake was likely due to the slow washout of radioactivity from brain and to noise in measurements of the low concentrations of [C-11]MePPEP in plasma. These results suggest that brain uptake can be used for within subject studies (e. g., to measure receptor occupancy by medications) but that distribution volume remains the gold standard for accurate measurements between groups. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available