4.7 Article

The myth of the normal, average human brain-The ICBM experience: (1) Subject screening and eligibility

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 914-922

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.062

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Human Brain Project [P20-MHDA52176, 5P01-EB001955]
  2. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  3. National Institute of Mental Health
  4. National Institute for Drug Abuse
  5. National Cancer Institute and the National Institute for Neurologic Disease and Stroke
  6. Brain Mapping Medical Research Organization
  7. Brain Mapping Support Foundation
  8. Pierson-Lovelace Foundation
  9. The Ahmanson Foundation
  10. Tamkin Foundation
  11. William M. and Linda R. Dietel Philanthropic Fund at the Northern Piedmont Community Foundation
  12. Jennifer Jones-Simon Foundation
  13. Capital Group Companies Charitable Foundation
  14. Robson Family and Northstar Fund
  15. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) [RR12169, RR13642, RR00865]
  16. National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the course of developing an atlas and reference system for the normal human brain throughout the human age span from structural and functional brain imaging data, the International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) developed a set of normal criteria for subject inclusion and the associated exclusion criteria. The approach was to minimize inclusion of subjects with any medical disorders that could affect brain structure or function. In the past two years, a group of 1685 potential subjects responded to solicitation advertisements at one of the consortium sites (UCLA). Subjects were screened by a detailed telephone interview and then had an in-person history and physical examination. Of those who responded to the advertisement and considered themselves to be normal, only 31.6% (532 subjects) passed the telephone screening process. Of the 348 individuals who submitted to in-person history and physical examinations, only 51.7% passed these screening procedures. Thus, only 10.7% of those individuals who responded to the original advertisement qualified for imaging. The most frequent cause for exclusion in the second phase of subject screening was high blood pressure followed by abnormal signs on neurological examination. It is concluded that the majority of individuals who consider themselves normal by self-report are found not to be so by detailed historical interviews about underlying medical conditions and by thorough medical and neurological examinations. Recommendations are made with regard to the inclusion of subjects in brain imaging studies and the criteria used to select them. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available