4.7 Article

Common and distinct neural correlates of perceptual and memorial selection

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages 963-975

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [0520992]
  2. NIMH [MH60655]
  3. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0520992] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [0520992] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  7. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0822748] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A critical aspect of cognitive control is the ability to select goal-relevant information in the face of competing distraction. A popular account is that common top-down selection processes underlie the ability to select among competing percepts and memories. We test the degree to which selective attention and memorial selection recruit the same neural resources. We demonstrate that both functions elicit largely overlapping networks within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), frontal eye fields (FEF), premotor cortex, and superior parietal lobule (SPL). Despite the close commonalities of selective attention and memorial selection, our results demonstrate that the SPL and FEF show preferential involvement in selective attention, whereas left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) is uniquely associated with memorial selection. Thus, the two sorts of selection are not identical. We show further that variations in shared selection circuits are associated with differences in behavioral performance, suggesting that economy of control is beneficial to performance. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available