4.5 Article

Preparation and characterization of hydrophobic silica aerogel sphere products by co-precursor method

Journal

SOLID STATE SCIENCES
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages 155-162

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2015.08.005

Keywords

Silica aerogel ball; MTES/TEOS; Sol-gel; Hydrophobic; Thermal stability

Funding

  1. Science Foundation of Southwest University of Science and Technology [11zx7157]
  2. Scientific Research Fund of SiChuan Provincial Education Department [14ZA0105, 14ZD1122]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present paper, silica aerogel balls were prepared using methyltriethoxysilane (MTES) and tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) co-precursor with different MTES/TEOS molar ratio (I) by two-step acid-base catalyzed sol-gel process and molding technology followed by the carbon dioxide supercritical drying. The physical properties of various silica aerogels whose I varied from 0 to 1.0 were studied by BET and SEM. Approving aerogel ball was obtained by using acetone as exchanging solvent at I of 0.8. Better properties are less crack, little shrinking percentage (17%), low apparent density (0.103 g/cm(3)), large surface area (996.35 m(2)/g) and high pore volume (3.32 cm(3)/g). Characterized by contact angle measurements and thermal stability, the characterizations of aerogel spheres were strongly affected by the MTES/TEOS molar ratio. Hydrophobic property increased with the increase in I value, and silica aerogels at I = 0.8 and 1.0 have a superhydrophobic characterization with the highest contact angle (152 degrees). The TG-DTA analysis shows that the silica aerogel spheres transform hydrophobic to hydrophilic at around 450 degrees C, which is due to oxidation of Si-CH3 to Si-OH groups. The surface chemical modification was confirmed by FT-IR spectrums, which demonstrated that Si-CH3 groups be beneficial to molding of silica aerogels. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available