4.7 Article

Morphology and evolution of cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis. A longitudinal MRI study

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 1324-1328

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.028

Keywords

cortical lesions; multiple sclerosis; MRI; double inversion recovery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cortical lesions (CLs) can be detected in the majority of patients with established multiple sclerosis (MS), but little is known about their evolution over time. This study was performed to investigate the short-term MRI evolution of CLs, with the ultimate aim to achieve a better in vivo understanding of their nature. Seven hundred and sixty-eight CLs from 107 MS patients (76 with relapsing-remitting [RR] and 31 with secondary progressive [SP] MS) were followed with brain MR examinations, including a double inversion recovery (DIR) sequence, every 6 months for 1 year. CLs' number, volume and morphological features were assessed at each time-point. Six hundred and eighty CLs (88.5%) remained morphologically unchanged during the follow-up period, while 74 (9.6%) showed an increase in size. Only 6 (0.8%) CLs seen at baseline (all in RRMS patients) disappeared at follow-up MRI scans. No enlarging CLs spread into the subcortical white matter. No CLs ever showed gadolinium enhancement. At baseline, the mean number of CLs was higher in SPMS than in RRMS patients (p < 0.001), whereas the mean number of new CLs per patient after I year did not differ between the two groups. Over a one-year period, CLs can increase their number and size in a relevant Proportion of MS patients, without spreading into the subcortical white matter OF showing inflammatory features similar to those of white matter lesions. The short-term rate of CLs accumulation does not seem to vary according to the clinical stage of MS. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available