4.1 Article

Variants in eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G1 in sporadic Parkinson's disease

Journal

NEUROGENETICS
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 281-285

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10048-012-0334-9

Keywords

Genetics; Rare variants; Parkinson's disease; EIF4G1

Funding

  1. Technische Universitat Munchen, Munich, Germany
  2. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  3. Desitin Pharmaceuticals
  4. GmbH
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim
  6. GE Healthcare
  7. Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
  8. American Parkinson's Disease Association
  9. Stifterverband fur die Deutsche Wissenschaft
  10. Hungarian National Innovation Office [TAMOP-4-2-1/B-03/1/KMR-2010-001]
  11. NINDS Intramural Competitive Fellowship
  12. Austrian Science Fund [J2783-B09]
  13. NINDS Intramural Research Program
  14. German RLS foundation
  15. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  16. Fritz Thyssen Foundation
  17. Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen, Munich, Germany
  18. government funding from the German Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [03.2007-02.2011 FKZ 01ET0713]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, mutations in eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G1 (EIF4G1) were reported as a rare cause of familial Parkinson's disease (PD). We screened the 33 exons of EIF4G1 by high-resolution melting curve analysis for variants in our Central European cohort of 376 PD cases. Variant frequency was assessed in a total of 975 PD cases and 1,014 general population controls. Eight novel nonsynonymous and four synonymous variants were identified. In our cohort, novel and previously identified nonsynonymous variants were very rare. Although it is possible that our general population controls also comprise individuals who have or could develop PD in the future, the presence of the original mutation (EIF4G1 p.Arg1205 His) in three controls only, raises questions about the causality of this variant with regard to PD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available