4.1 Article

The effect of SNCA 3' region on the levels of SNCA-112 splicing variant

Journal

NEUROGENETICS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 59-64

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10048-010-0263-4

Keywords

SNCA-mRNA; SNCA112; Splicing; Parkinson's disease; Functional variants; eSNP

Funding

  1. Ellison Medical Foundation [AG-NS-0441-08]
  2. Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy at Duke University
  3. Kathleen Price Bryan Brain Bank (KPBBB) at Duke University [NIA AG028377]
  4. National NeuroAIDS Tissue Consortium (NNTC)
  5. Layton Aging & Alzheimer's Disease Center at Oregon Health and Science University [NIA AG008017]
  6. NICHD Brain and Tissue Bank for Developmental Disorders at the University of Maryland, Baltimore (NICHD) [HHSN275200900011C, NO1-HD-9-0011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic variability at the 3' region of SNCA locus has been repeatedly associated with susceptibility to sporadic Parkinson's disease (PD). Accumulated evidence emphasizes the importance of SNCA dosage and expression levels in PD pathogenesis. However, the mechanism through which the 3' region of SNCA gene modulates the risk to develop sporadic PD remained elusive. We studied the effect of PD risk-associated variants at SNCA 3' regions on SNCA112-mRNA (exon 5 in-frame skipping) levels in vivo in 117 neuropathologically normal, human brain frontal cortex samples. SNPs tagging the SNCA 3' showed significant effects on the relative levels of SNCA112-mRNA from total SNCA transcripts levels. The risk alleles were correlated with increased expression ratio of SNCA112-mRNA from total. We provide evidence for functional consequences of PD-associated SNCA gene variants at the 3' region, suggesting that genetic regulation of SNCA splicing plays an important role in the development of the disease. Further studies to determine the definite functional variant/s within SNCA 3'and to establish their association with PD pathology are necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available