4.4 Article

Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry/topography in a healthy Korean population and the effects of gender and body mass index

Journal

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 529-537

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12297

Keywords

Asians; body mass index; gender; high-resolution anorectal manometry; reference values

Funding

  1. Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility [2012-012]
  2. Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health Welfare, Korea [A062254]
  3. Asan Institute for Life Sciences [2013-559]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundHigh-resolution manometry (HRM) based on spatiotemporal plots is increasingly being used. The aim this study was to evaluate, for the first time, the influence of gender, with adjustment for age, body mass index (BMI), and vaginal delivery, on anorectal functions in asymptomatic adults. MethodsFifty-four asymptomatic healthy subjects (M:F=27:27; age=20-67years) who were matched by age and gender were enrolled prospectively. We evaluated anorectal pressures, rectal sensation using a HRM probe, and balloon expulsion time. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to identify the independent effects of each factor. Key ResultsAnal resting pressure (median [IQR]; 32 [18] vs 46 [17] mmHg, p<0.001), anal squeeze pressure (75 [28] vs 178 [72] mmHg, p<0.001), rectal pressure (33 [16] vs 53 [46] mmHg, p=0.009) and anal pressure (16 [17] vs 30 [36] mmHg, p=0.019) during simulated evacuation with rectal distention, and the threshold for the desire to defecate (60 [20] vs 80 [60] mL, p=0.020) were significantly lower in women than in men. BMI was positively correlated with anal resting pressure (95% CI: 0.598-2.947) and negatively correlated with the threshold for first sensation (95% CI: -0.099 to -0.015). Vaginal delivery did not affect any of the anorectal HRM parameters. Conclusions & InferencesHRM parameters may be associated with gender and BMI. Therefore, gender and BMI should be taken into consideration when interpreting HRM results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available