4.4 Article

Toward more accurate measurements of anorectal motor and sensory function in routine clinical practice: Validation of High- Resolution Anorectal Manometry and Rapid Barostat Bag measurements of rectal function

Journal

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 685-695

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12317

Keywords

anorectal function; high-resolution anorectal manometry; rectal barostat; rectal compliance

Funding

  1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundMeasurements of anorectal function using high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) and rectal barostat technology provide more reliable results than standard ARM with an elastic balloon; however, HR-ARM results have not been compared to ARM and standard barostat protocols are impractical in routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to validate HR-ARM against standard ARM and standard barostat against a novel Rapid Barostat Bag (RBB) measurement and elastic balloon measurements of rectal function. MethodsTwenty-six healthy volunteers (15 female, 11 male, 19-52years) were studied. Measurements of anal function and simulated defecation were compared for 12-sensor HR-ARM and 6-sensor standard ARM using line plots from the same recording. Rectal capacity, compliance, and sensation (volume threshold) were measured by elastic balloon, standard barostat, and RBB methods using stepwise inflation of a 700-mL polyethylene bag to 40mmHg distension by electronic barostat and handheld syringe monitored by sphygmo-manometer, respectively. Results are reported as meanSD. Bland-Altman plots and correlation coefficients (r) for measurements were calculated. Key ResultsThere was excellent agreement between HR- and standard ARM measurements (r>0.86, <25mmHg difference) and between standard barostat and RBB measurements of rectal capacity (r=0.97, <25mL difference). Correlation coefficients of threshold volumes for initial perception, urgency and discomfort were 0.37, 0.71, and 0.95, respectively. No significant correlation was present with elastic balloon measurements. Time to complete studies was shorter for HR-ARM than standard ARM and for RBB than standard barostat in historical controls. Conclusions & InferencesHR-ARM with RBB measurements of anorectal function provides quick and reasonably accurate measurements of continence function suitable for use in routine clinical practice ( NCT01456442).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available