4.4 Article

Reduced anxiety-like behavior and central neurochemical change in germ-free mice

Journal

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01620.x

Keywords

anxiety-like behavior; elevated plus maze; gnotobiotic; gut-brain axis; hippocampus

Funding

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  3. Ontario Graduate Scholarship
  4. Ontario Graduate Scholarship in Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background There is increasing interest in the gut-brain axis and the role intestinal microbiota may play in communication between these two systems. Acquisition of intestinal microbiota in the immediate postnatal period has a defining impact on the development and function of the gastrointestinal, immune, neuroendocrine and metabolic systems. For example, the presence of gut microbiota regulates the set point for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity. Methods We investigated basal behavior of adult germ-free (GF), Swiss Webster female mice in the elevated plus maze (EPM) and compared this to conventionally reared specific pathogen free (SPF) mice. Additionally, we measured brain mRNA expression of genes implicated in anxiety and stress-reactivity. Key Results Germ-free mice, compared to SPF mice, exhibited basal behavior in the EPM that can be interpreted as anxiolytic. Altered GF behavior was accompanied by a decrease in the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit NR2B mRNA expression in the central amygdala, increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression and decreased serotonin receptor 1A (5HT1A) expression in the dentate granule layer of the hippocampus. Conclusions & Inferences We conclude that the presence or absence of conventional intestinal microbiota influences the development of behavior, and is accompanied by neurochemical changes in the brain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available