4.3 Article

DQ-DRENAR with back-to-back (BABA) excitation: Measuring homonuclear dipole-dipole interactions in multiple spin-1/2 systems

Journal

SOLID STATE NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 11-18

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2015.10.007

Keywords

DRENAR; BABA; Dipolar coupling; Double quantum excitation

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB858]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 61475174]
  3. 100 Talents Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  4. Open Fund from State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures
  5. FAPESP [2013/07793-6]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new pulse sequence entitled DQ-DRENAR, (Double-Quantum based Dipolar Recoupling Effects Nuclear Alignment Reduction) was recently described for the quantitative measurement of magnetic dipole-dipole interactions in homonuclear spin-1/2 systems involving multiple nuclei. The double quantum coherences were created via a windowless symmetry-based pulse sequence (POST-C7). The present contribution evaluates the performance of the Back-to-Back excitation pulse scheme BABA-xyl6 in such DRENAR experiments. Using SIMPSON simulations, special attention is given to finite pulse length effects, dipolar truncation, and chemical shift anisotropy interference. Experimental results on model compounds demonstrate good stability up to long mixing times ( > 10 ms) as well as high accuracy. As its dipolar coupling efficiency is relatively high (the dipolar coupling scaling factor is 4.24 times as high as that of POST-C7), DQ-DRENAR-BABA-xy16 is most appropriate for the measurement of relatively weak dipolar coupling strengths ( < 400 Hz). Different from POST-C7, for which the spinning rate is limited to 1/7 of the nutation frequency, DQ-DRENAR-BABA-xy16 experiments can take full advantage of ultrafast MAS experiments. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available