4.2 Article

TDP-43-Based Animal Models of Neurodegeneration: New Insights into ALS Pathology and Pathophysiology

Journal

NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 262-274

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000321547

Keywords

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Frontotemporal lobar degeneration; Motor neuron disease; Protein aggregation; TDP-43

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [K08 NS055980, R01 NS069669]
  2. Muscular Dystrophy Association [135428]
  3. Children's Discovery Institute
  4. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  5. Ruth Kirschstein National Research Service Award
  6. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [UL1TR000448] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS069669, K08NS055980] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The clinical and pathological overlap between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) suggests these diseases share common underlying mechanisms, a suggestion underscored by the discovery that TDP-43 inclusions are a key pathologic feature in both ALS and FTLD. This finding, combined with the identification of TDP-43 mutations in ALS, directly implicates this DNA/RNA binding protein in disease pathogenesis in ALS and FTLD. However, many key questions remain, including what is the normal function of TDP-43, and whether disease-associated mutations produce toxicity in the nucleus, cytoplasm or both. Furthermore, although pathologic TDP-43 inclusions are clearly associated with many forms of neurodegeneration, whether TDP-43 aggregation is a key step in the pathogenesis in ALS, FTLD and other disorders remains to be proven. This review will compare the features of numerous recently developed animal models of TDP-43-related neurodegeneration, and discuss how they contribute to our understanding of the pathogenesis of human ALS and FTLD. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available