Journal
NEUROCRITICAL CARE
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 33-41Publisher
HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-018-0595-8
Keywords
Brain injury; Decision-making; Disability; Chronic conditions and rehabilitation; End-of-life issues
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
BackgroundWithdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WOLST) is the leading proximate cause of death in patients with perceived devastating brain injury (PDBI). There are reasons to believe that a potentially significant proportion of WOLST decisions, in this setting, are premature and guided by a number of assumptions that falsely confer a sense of certainty.MethodThis manuscript proposes that these assumptions face serious challenges, and that we should replace unwarranted certainty with an appreciation for the great degree of multi-dimensional uncertainty involved. The article proceeds by offering a taxonomy of uncertainty in PDBI and explores the key role that uncertainty as a cognitive state, may play into how WOLST decisions are reached.ConclusionIn order to properly share decision-making with families and surrogates of patients with PDBI, we will have to acknowledge, understand, and be able to communicate the great degree of uncertainty involved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available