4.4 Review

Model-based Indices Describing Cerebrovascular Dynamics

Journal

NEUROCRITICAL CARE
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 142-157

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-013-9868-4

Keywords

Cerebrovascular bed; Cerebral blood flow; Cerebrospinal fluid; Hydrodynamic models; Model-based indices; Mathematical modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the dynamic relationship between cerebral blood flow (CBF) and the circulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can facilitate management of cerebral pathologies. For this reason, various hydrodynamic models have been introduced in order to simulate the phenomena governing the interaction between CBF and CSF. The identification of hydrodynamic models requires an array of signals as input, with the most common of them being arterial blood pressure, intracranial pressure, and cerebral blood flow velocity; monitoring all of them is considered as a standard practice in neurointensive care. Based on these signals, physiological parameters like cerebrovascular resistance, compliances of cerebrovascular bed, and CSF space could then be estimated. Various secondary model-based indices describing cerebrovascular dynamics have been introduced, like the cerebral arterial time constant or critical closing pressure. This review presents model-derived indices that describe cerebrovascular phenomena, the nature of which is both physiological (carbon dioxide reactivity and arterial hypotension) and pathological (cerebral artery stenosis, intracranial hypertension, and cerebral vasospasm). In a neurointensive environment, real-time monitoring of a patient with these indices may be able to provide a detection of the onset of a cerebrovascular phenomenon, which could have otherwise been missed. This potentially early warning indicator may then prove to be important for the therapeutic management of the patient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available