4.4 Article

Vasopressor Use and Effect on Blood Pressure After Severe Adult Traumatic Brain Injury

Journal

NEUROCRITICAL CARE
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 46-54

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-010-9448-9

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury; Vasopressor; Phenylephrine; Norepinephrine; Dopamine; Cerebral perfusion pressure

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS072308, R01 NS072308-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe institutional vasopressor usage, and examine the effect of vasopressors on hemodynamics: heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO(2)), and jugular venous oximetry (SjVO(2)) in adults with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We performed a retrospective analysis of 114 severely head injured patients who were admitted to the neurocritical care unit of Level 1 trauma center and who received vasopressors (phenylephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, vasopressin or epinephrine) to increase blood pressure Phenylephrine was the most commonly used vasopressor (43%), followed by norepinephrine (30%), dopamine (22%), and vasopressin (5%). Adjusted for age, gender, injury severity score, vasopressor dose, baseline blood pressure, fluid administration, propofol sedation, and hypertonic saline infusion, phenylephrine use was associated with 8 mmHg higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) than dopamine (P = 0.03), and 12 mmHg higher cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) than norepinephrine (P = 0.02) during the 3 h after vasopressor start. There was no difference in ICP between the drug groups, either at baseline or after vasopressor treatment. Most severe TBI patients received phenylephrine. Patients who received phenylephrine had higher MAP and CPP than patients who received dopamine and norepinephrine, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available