4.4 Article

Detectable Levels of Cytochrome c and Activated Caspase-9 in Cerebrospinal Fluid after Human Traumatic Brain Injury

Journal

NEUROCRITICAL CARE
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 337-341

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-009-9328-3

Keywords

Activated caspase-9; Cytochrome c; Traumatic brain injury

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The intrinsic pathway of apoptosis has been proposed as one mechanism of cell death after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study tested the hypothesis that cytochrome c and activated caspase-9 are released into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after severe TBI and that their presence correlates with mitochondrial injury and severity of neurologic outcome. Nine adult patients with severe TBI (GCS a parts per thousand currency sign 8) underwent placement of intraventricular catheters for monitoring and management of intracranial pressure. CSF was sampled at catheter insertion (2-26 h after injury) and at intervals of 24, 48, and 72 h thereafter. Control samples were obtained from patients undergoing spinal anesthesia (ASA1). CSF levels of cytochrome c and activated caspase-9 were measured using ELISA. Cytochrome c was detected in 18 (51.4%) samples, in the range of 0.08-5 ng/ml; mean value for cytochrome c was 0.44 ng/ml (SD +/- A 0.632). Activated caspase-9 was detected in 10 samples (28.6%); mean value was 0.28 ng/ml (SD +/- A 0.39). R (s) between cytochrome c and Glasgow outcome score (GOS) was -0.25 (P = 0.14), and between GOS and activated caspase-9 was -0.35 (P = 0.04). R calculated based on linear regression of activated caspase-9 and cytochrome c concentrations was 0.18. Control CSF samples had no detectable levels of either marker (detection level for cytochrome c was 0.08 ng/ml and 0.20 for activated caspase-9). We concluded that activated caspase-9 and cytochrome c are present in the CSF of patients with severe TBI. Activated caspase-9 shows weak correlation with poor neurologic outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available