4.6 Article

Using a stacked residual LSTM model for sentiment intensity prediction

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 322, Issue -, Pages 93-101

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.09.049

Keywords

Sentiment intensity prediction; Stacked residual LSTM; Neural network; Sentiment analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61702443, 61762091]
  2. Educational Commission of Yunnan Province of China [2017ZZX030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sentiment intensity of a text indicates the strength of its association with positive sentiment, which is a continuous real-value between 0 and 1. Compared to polarity classification, predicting sentiment intensities for texts can achieve more fine-grained sentiment analyses. By introducing word embedding techniques, recent studies that use deep neural models have outperformed existing lexicon- and regression-based methods for sentiment intensity prediction. For better performance, a common way of a neural network is to add more layers in order to learn high-level features. However, when the depth increases, the network degrades and becomes more difficult to train. Since the errors between layers will be accumulated, and gradients will be vanished. To address this problem, this paper proposes a stacked residual LSTM model to predict sentiment intensity for a given text. By investigating the performances of shallow and deep architectures, we introduce a residual connection to every few LSTM layers to construct an 8-layer neural network. The residual connection can center layer gradients and propagated errors. Thus it makes the deeper network easier to optimize. This approach enables us to stack more layers of LSTM successfully for this task, which can improve the prediction accuracy of existing methods. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms lexicon-, regression-, and conventional NN-based methods proposed in previous studies. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available