4.6 Article

Bayesian tensor factorization for multi-way analysis of multi-dimensional EEG

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 318, Issue -, Pages 162-174

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.08.045

Keywords

Multi-dimensional EEG; Bayesian tensor factorization; Rank reduction; Denoising; Multi-way analysis; Big time series data

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61772380]
  2. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of Hubei Province [2017CFA007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Factorization-based analysis of multi-dimensional EEG (Electroencephalography) has become increasingly important in neuroscience research and practices with the capability of extracting latent multi-way features. However, how to sift the most informative factors of routinely noisy EEG remains unclear especially under the circumstance of no a priori knowledge. This study proposes a Bayesian tensor factorization (BTF) model as a one-stop solution to the challenges. BTF assumes non-informative priori on potential distribution of factors and noise derived from exponential family distribution. A high-dimensional variational Bayesian inference method is designed to iteratively estimate the posterior distribution of potential factors. The factor vectors whose elements are small values can then be identified as redundancy and filtered out afterwards. Finally, the study enables a generic factorization-based method for multi-way analysis of brain states. Results from experiments on synthesized tensors indicate that (1) BTF excels in processing EEG tensor mixed with intensive white noises in comparison with the traditional counterparts; and (2) the non-informative components in factors can be filtered out effectively (rank reduction). Two case studies of factorization-based multi-way analysis assisted by a Multi-Layer Perception (MLP) network have been performed on two real EEG datasets, and (1) seizure detection and (2) sleep stage classification can be achieved with averaged accuracy up to 99.52% and 90.81% respectively. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available