4.6 Article

Review and performance comparison of SVM- and ELM-based classifiers

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages 507-516

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2013.08.009

Keywords

Machine learning; Classification; Convex quadratic programming; SVM; ELM; Randomization

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M520624]
  3. National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China [61305075]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents how commonly used machine learning classifiers can be analyzed using a common framework of convex optimization. Four classifier models, the Support Vector Machine (SVM), the Least-Squares SVM (LSSVM), the Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), and the Margin Loss ELM (MLELM) are discussed to demonstrate how specific parametrizations of a general problem statement affect the classifier design and performance, and how ideas from the four different classifiers can be mixed and used together. Furthermore, 21 public domain benchmark datasets are used to experimentally evaluate five performance metrics of each model and corroborate the theoretical analysis. Comparison of classification accuracies under a nested cross-validation evaluation shows that with an exception all four models perform similarly on the evaluated datasets. However, the four classifiers command different amounts of computational resources for both testing and training. These requirements are directly linked to their formulations as different convex optimization problems. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available