4.6 Article

Traffic flow forecasting by seasonal SVR with chaotic simulated annealing algorithm

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 74, Issue 12-13, Pages 2096-2107

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2010.12.032

Keywords

Traffic flow forecasting; Seasonal adjustment; Support vector regression (SVR); Chaotic simulated annealing algorithm (CSA); SARIMA; Seasonal Holt-Winters (SHW); Back-propagation neural network (BPNN)

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC 98-2410-H-161-001, NSC 98-2811-H-161-001, NSC 99-2410-H-161-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate forecasting of inter-urban traffic flow has been one of the most important issues globally in the research on road traffic congestion. However, the information of inter-urban traffic presents a challenging situation; the traffic flow forecasting involves a rather complex nonlinear data pattern, particularly during daily peak periods, traffic flow data reveals cyclic (seasonal) trend. In the recent years, the support vector regression model (SVR) has been widely used to solve nonlinear regression and time series problems. However, the applications of SVR models to deal with cyclic (seasonal) trend time series have not been widely explored. This investigation presents a traffic flow forecasting model that combines the seasonal support vector regression model with chaotic simulated annealing algorithm (SSVRCSA), to forecast inter-urban traffic flow. Additionally, a numerical example of traffic flow values from northern Taiwan is employed to elucidate the forecasting performance of the proposed SSVRCSA model. The forecasting results indicate that the proposed model yields more accurate forecasting results than the seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA), back-propagation neural network (BPNN) and seasonal Holt-Winters (SHW) models. Therefore, the SSVRCSA model is a promising alternative for forecasting traffic flow. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available