4.6 Article

No-reference image quality assessment in contourlet domain

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 73, Issue 4-6, Pages 784-794

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2009.10.012

Keywords

Image quality assessment; No reference; Image modeling; Contourlets

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [60771068, 60702061, 60832005]
  2. National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition in China
  3. National Laboratory of Automatic Target Recognition, Shenzhen University, China
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and innovative Research Team in University of China [IRT0645]
  5. Nanyang Technological University Nanyang [M58020010]
  6. Microsoft Operations PTE LTDNTU [M48020065]
  7. K.C. Wong Education Foundation Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The target of no-reference (NR) image quality assessment (IQA) is to establish a computational model to predict the visual quality of an image. The existing prominent method is based on natural scene statistics (NSS). It uses the joint and marginal distributions of wavelet coefficients for IQA. However, this method is only applicable to JPEG2000 compressed images. Since the wavelet transform fails to capture the directional information of images, an improved NSS model is established by contourlets. In this paper, the contourlet transform is utilized to NSS of images, and then the relationship of contourlet coefficients is represented by the joint distribution. The statistics of contourlet coefficients are applicable to indicate variation of image quality. in addition, an image-dependent threshold is adopted to reduce the effect of content to the statistical model. Finally, image quality can be evaluated by combining the extracted features in each subband nonlinearly. Our algorithm is trained and tested on the LIVE database II. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is superior to the conventional NSS model and can be applied to different distortions. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available