4.1 Article

Epidemiology of glioblastoma

Journal

NEUROCHIRURGIE
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages 433-440

Publisher

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2010.07.011

Keywords

Brain tumor; Glioblastoma; Epidemiology; Risk factor; Incidence; Registry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An increasing incidence of glioblastoma has been observed over the last 30 years. Improvements in diagnostic tools such as CT scans and MRI, changes observed in histological classifications, and adjustments in neurosurgical practices have contributed substantially to this increase. Moreover, the aging of the population and the increasing occurrence of glioblastoma beyond 60 years of age are additional explanations. In Gironde (France), where a specialized registry has been established, the annual incidence of glioblastoma is 4.96/100,000. Wide geographic variations are observed, possibly linked to ethnicity. However, the role of intrinsic and/or extrinsic factors cannot be ruled out. Comparing data between registries is difficult and requires taking into account periods of recruitment and diagnostic tools. Ethnicity, age, sex, hereditary syndromes, some constitutive polymorphisms, and brain irradiation are the established risk factors Allergies or asthma, certain viral infections, autoimmune diseases, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake, substitutive hormonal therapy, and dietary antioxidant intake are the established protective factors. Many studies on electromagnetic fields - in particular cellular phones pesticides, solvents, and other factors have been published. Until now, the results are discordant or are not confirmed because of methodological limitations. Future studies combining constitutive polymorphisms and exposure assessment are likely to provide consistent and important data that will improve our knowledge in the epidemiology of glioblastoma. (C) 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available