4.5 Article

Neuronal Expression of Splice Variants of Glial Glutamate Transporters in Brains Afflicted by Alzheimer's Disease: Unmasking an Intrinsic Neuronal Property

Journal

NEUROCHEMICAL RESEARCH
Volume 34, Issue 10, Pages 1748-1757

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11064-009-9957-0

Keywords

Glutamate transporter; Neurodegeneration; Excitotoxicity; GLT-1; GLAST; EAAC1; Dementia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anomalies in glutamate homeostasis may contribute to the pathological processes involved in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Glutamate released from neurons or glial cells is normally rapidly cleared by glutamate transporters, most of which are expressed at the protein level by glial cells. However, in some patho-physiological situations, expression of glutamate transporters that are normally considered to be glial types, appears to be evoked in populations of distressed neurons. This study analysed the expression of exon-skipping forms of the three predominant excitatory amino acid (glutamate) transporters (EAATs1-3) in brains afflicted with AD. We demonstrate by immunocytochemistry in temporal cortex, the expression of these proteins particularly in limited subsets of neurons, some of which appeared to be dys-morphic. Whilst the neuronal expression of the glial glutamate transporters EAAT1 and EAAT2 is frequently considered to represent the abnormal and ectopic expression of such transporters, we suggest this may be a misinterpretation, since neurons such as cortical pyramidal cells normally express abundant mRNA for these EAATs (but little if any EAAT protein expression). We hypothesize instead that distressed neurons in the AD brain can turn on the translation of pre-existent mRNA pools, or suppress the degradation of alternately spliced glutamate transporter protein, leading to the unmasking of, rather than evoked expression of glial glutamate transporters in stressed neurons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available