4.3 Article

Object recognition memory and temporal lobe activation after delayed estrogen replacement therapy

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages 19-25

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2012.12.016

Keywords

Estrogen replacement therapy; Object recognition memory; c-Fos; Amygdala; Perirhinal cortex; Hippocampus

Funding

  1. FAPEMIG
  2. CNPq
  3. CAPES

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The critical window hypothesis predicts that estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) must be administered early on the menopause or ovariectomy (OVX) to positively affect cognition. However, the neural substrates, underling the time dependent efficacy of ERT, are still not completely known. In order to address this issue, we submitted female mice to 12 weeks of OVX followed by 5 weeks of chronic ERT (OVXE2). Within the first 12 weeks, the OVX animals showed a progressive compromised performance in the object recognition memory (ORM) task. After ERT, OVXE2 mice, but not the control group (OVXoil), were able to recognize the new object in the test session. Further, we evaluated the c-Fos expression in hippocampus, perirhinal cortex (PC) and central amygdala (CeA) of OVXoil and OVXE2 mice, after context exposure (CTX) or object exploration (OBJ). We observed that ERT increased c-Fos expression unspecifically for CTX and OBJ. In addition, only the OVXE2 group showed significantly higher c-Fos expression in the PC and CeA after object exploration. Thus, our results showed that delayed chronic ERT improves ORM (compromised by OVX) and increases constitutive c-Fos expression in temporal lobe regions. Furthermore, we showed for the first time that PC and CeA, but not the hippocampus, present a distinct pattern of activation in response to object exploration in ovariectomized females that underwent delayed-ERT. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available