4.3 Article

Chronic stress prior to hippocampal stroke enhances post-stroke spatial deficits in the ziggurat task

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY
Volume 95, Issue 3, Pages 335-345

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2011.01.006

Keywords

Hippocampal stroke; Endothelin-1; Restraint stress; Spatial performance; Ziggurat task

Funding

  1. Iran Ministry of Health and Medical Education (IMHME)
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Canadian Stroke Network
  4. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stress is one of the most important variables to determine recovery following stroke. We have previously reported that post-stroke exposure to either stress or corticosterone (CORT) alleviates hippocampal ischemic outcome. The present experiment expands previous findings by investigating the influence of exposure to stress prior to ischemic event. Rats received either daily restraint stress (1 h/day; 16 consecutive days) or COAT (0.5 mg/kg: 16 consecutive days) prior to focal ischemic stroke in the hippocampus induced by bilateral injection of endothelin-1 (ET-1). All experimental groups were then tested in the ziggurat task, a new task for spatial cognition. The stress + stroke group showed significant deficits in both hippocampal structure and function. No deleterious effect of pre-stroke exposure to CORT was found in the CORT + stroke group. Our results indicate that a history of chronic stress sensitizes hippocampal cells to the damaging consequences of focal ischemia. The opposing effects of CORT-related experiences in this study not only reflect the diversity of glucocorticoid actions in the stress response, but also provide evidence that elevated CORT in the absence of emotional disturbance is not sufficient to produce hippocampal deficit. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available