4.3 Article

Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) knockout mice exhibit enhanced acquisition of an aversive, but not of an appetitive, Barnes maze task

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY
Volume 92, Issue 4, Pages 597-601

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2009.06.001

Keywords

Endogenous cannabinoid; Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH); N-arachidonoyl ethanolamine (anandamide); Cannabinoid CB1 receptor; Rimonabant (SR141716); Learning and memory; Barnes maze

Funding

  1. NIDA [R01DA015683, R01DA15197, P01DA017259, P01DA009789, P50DA005274, T23DA07027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well established that genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition of the CB1 receptor disrupts extinction learning in aversive conditioning tasks, but not in appetitive tasks. Consistent with these findings is that genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), the primary catabolic enzyme of the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide (AEA), accelerates acquisition as well as extinction in aversive conditioning tasks. However, it is unknown whether FAAH blockade will affect acquisition in an appetitive conditioning task. Therefore, in the present study, we assessed FAAH (-/-) and (+/+) mice in appetitive and aversive Barnes maze conditioning procedures. Here we report that FAAH (-/-) mice displayed accelerated acquisition rates in an aversively-motivated, but not in the appetitively-motivated, Barnes maze task. The CB1 receptor antagonist, rimonabant attenuated enhanced acquisition in the aversive procedure, consistent with the idea that elevated AEA levels mediate this apparent nootropic effect. These findings support the hypothesis that stimulation of the endocannabinoid system enhances learned behavior in aversive, but not appetitive, conditioning paradigms. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available