4.3 Article

Molecular and cellular mechanisms of memory allocation in neuronetworks

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages 285-292

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2007.08.017

Keywords

memory allocation; competition; CAMP-response element binding protein (CREB); activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc); metaplasticity

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG013622, R01 AG013622-09, R01 AG013622] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [P50 MH077972-02, P50 MH077972, MH077972] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Determining how neuronal networks encode memories is a key goal of neuroscience. Although neuronal circuit processes involved in encoding, storing and retrieving memory have attracted a great deal of attention, the processes that allocate individual memories to specific neurons within a network have remained elusive. Recent findings unraveled the first insights into the processes that modulate memory allocation in neuronetworks. They showed that neurons in the lateral amygdala compete to take part in auditory fear conditioned memory traces and that the levels of the transcription factor CREB (CAMP-response element binding protein) can affect the probability of a neuron to be recruited into a given memory representation. CREB-mediated transcriptional regulation involves several signaling pathways, known to mediate nuclear responses to diverse behavioral stimuli, along with coordinated interactions with multiple other transcription activators, coactivators and repressors. Moreover, activation of CREB triggers an autoinhibitory feedback loop, a metaplastic process that could be used to allocate memories away from cells that have been recently involved in memory. Beyond CREB, there may be a host of other processes that dynamically modulate memory allocation in neuronetworks by shaping cooperation and competition among neurons. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available