4.7 Article

LRRK2 mutations cause mitochondrial DNA damage in iPSC-derived neural cells from Parkinson's disease patients: Reversal by gene correction

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 381-386

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.10.013

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; LRRK2; Mitochondrial DNA damage; Stem cells

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [T32MH18273, 1F32ES019009, 1R01ES020718]
  2. American Parkinson Disease Association
  3. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine [CIRM TRI-01246, TTII-019665]
  4. Parkinson Alliance
  5. Blume Foundation [1RC2NS070276, 1U24NS078338]
  6. Harvard Stem Cell Institute Miller Consortium for the Development of Nervous System Therapies
  7. Consolidated Anti-Aging Foundation
  8. Poul Hansen Family
  9. Cooper Family
  10. JPB Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Parkinson's disease associated mutations in leucine rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) impair mitochondrial function and increase the vulnerability of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neural cells from patients to oxidative stress. Since mitochondria' DNA (mtDNA) damage can compromise mitochondrial function, we examined whether LRRK2 mutations can induce damage to the mitochondrial genome. We found greater levels of mtDNA damage in iPSC-derived neural cells from patients carrying homozygous or heterozygous LRRIQ G2019S mutations, or at-risk individuals carrying the heterozygous LRRK2 R1441C mutation, than in cells from unrelated healthy subjects who do not carry LRRK2 mutations. After zinc finger nuclease-mediated repair of the LRRK2 G20195 mutation in iPSCs, mtDNA damage was no longer detected in differentiated neuroprogenitor and neural cells. Our results unambiguously link LRRK2 mutations to mtDNA damage and validate a new cellular phenotype that can be used for examining pathogenic mechanisms and screening therapeutic strategies. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available