4.7 Review

Hereditary dystonia as a neurodevelopmental circuit disorder: Evidence from neuroimaging

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 202-209

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.10.010

Keywords

Dystonia; DYT1; DYT6; Brain networks; Motor activation; Imaging marker; Neurodevelopmental; Positron emission tomography

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH NINDS) [R01 047668]
  2. Bachmann-Strauss Dystonia & Parkinson Foundation
  3. Feinstein Institute for Medical Research General Clinical Research Center (National Centre for Research Resources, NIH) [M01 RR 018535]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primary dystonia has traditionally been viewed as a basal ganglia disorder, but recent studies suggest that the cerebellum plays a crucial role in the disease. Primary dystonia is associated with several genotypes. Among those, DYT1 and DYT6 are inherited in autosomal dominant fashion with reduced penetrance. Extensive structural and functional imaging studies have been performed on manifesting and non-manifesting carriers of these mutations. The results suggest that primary dystonia can be viewed as a neurodevelopmental circuit disorder, involving the cortico-striato-pallido-thalamo-cortical and cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathways. Anatomical disruption of the cerebellar outflow is found in non-manifesting and manifesting mutation carriers. and a second downstream disruption in thalamo-cortical projections appears clinically protective in non-manifesting carriers. The microstructural deficits in cerebellar outflow are linked to an abnormally elevated sensorimotor network (NMRP) in dystonia patients. Abnormal expression of this network is reduced by successful treatment with deep brain stimulation. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Advances in dystonia. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available